4.3 Article

The missing focus on women's health in the First 1,000 days approach to nutrition

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1526-1530

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020003894

关键词

Maternal and child nutrition; First 1; 000 Days; Women’ s health; Gender inequities

资金

  1. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship - Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. MRC [MR/P027938/1, MR/P012019/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The First 1,000 Days approach focuses on the nutrition of children from conception to their second birthday, emphasizing interventions through mothers. However, there is limited evidence on the impact of dietary interventions with pregnant and lactating women on women's health outcomes, which hinders advocacy efforts and research in this area.
The First 1,000 Days approach highlights the time between conception and a child's second birthday as a critical period where adequate nutrition is essential for adequate development and growth throughout the child's life and potentially onto their own offspring. Based on a review of relevant literature, this commentary explores the First 1,000 Days approach with a maternal lens. While the primary objective of the First 1,000 Days approach to nutrition is to reduce child malnutrition rates, particularly chronic undernutrition in the form of stunting, interventions are facilitated through mothers in terms of promoting healthy behaviours such as exclusive breast-feeding and attention to her nutritional status during pregnancy and lactation. Though these interventions were facilitated through women, women's health indicators are rarely tracked and measured, which we argue represents a missed opportunity to strengthen the evidence base for associations between maternal nutrition and women's health outcomes. Limited evidence on the effects of dietary interventions with pregnant and lactating mothers on women's health outcomes hinders advocacy efforts, which then contributes to lower prioritisation and less research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据