4.6 Article

Association of sleep duration and quality with elevated hs-CRP among healthy Korean adults

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238053

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2004-E71004-00, 2005-E71011-00, 2005-E7100900, 2006-E71001-00, 2006-E71004-00, 2006E71010-00, 2006E71003-00, 2007-E71004-00, 2007-E71006-00, 2008-E7100600, 2008-E7100800, 2009-E71009-00, 2010-E71006-00, 2011E71006-00, 2012-E71001-00, 2013-E7100900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the association of sleep duration and quality with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) among middle-aged and elderly Koreans. Among a total of 74,867 participants (25,069 men and 49,798 women) recruited for the Health Examinees (HEXA) study, adjusted geometric means of hs-CRP level were compared across categories of sleep duration (<6, 6-7, 8-9, and >= 10 hours) and sleep quality (difficulty in initiating sleep and maintaining sleep) using ANCOVA models. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for elevated hs-CRP (>3 mg/L) associated with sleep characteristics were estimated using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. Men who slept >= 10 hours per day were significantly associated with elevated hs-CRP (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.95). Whereas in women, difficulty in initiating sleep (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57 for Always), and maintaining sleep was significantly associated with elevated hs-CRP levels (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26 for Often; OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.28 for Always). Additionally, women who experienced poor sleep quality presented an elevated level of hs-CRP (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.23). Our findings suggest that excessive sleep duration and poor sleep quality are significantly associated with the elevated inflammatory marker, specifically hs-CRP. Further research is needed to examine the effect of sleep interventions focused on these factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据