4.1 Article

Prognostic nutritional index predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection

期刊

PERFUSION-UK
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 710-716

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0267659120961937

关键词

acute aortic dissection; in-hospital mortality; risk stratification; prognostic nutritional index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it was found that lower PNI values in ATAAD patients were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, and PNI may be useful in predicting early mortality in ATAAD patients after surgical repair.
Background: Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening medical emergency. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a novel inflammatory marker for ATAAD patients undergoing surgical repair. Methods: We retrospectively examined the medical records of 151 ATAAD patients who treated surgically. Patients were divided into two groups (survival and death) and these groups were compared with respect to clinical and laboratory parameters. The PNI was calculated as 10 x serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 x total lymphocyte count (per mm(3)). Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 61 +/- 12 years, 99 (65.6%) were males, and 35 (23.2%) patients died during the hospital stay. The PNI levels were significantly lower in death group compared with survival group (32.80 +/- 4.90 vs. 37.94 +/- 5.42, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the PNI (OR: 0.795, p = 0.005), age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.085, p = 0.034), operating time (OR: 1.660, p = 0.042), and D-dimer (OR: 1.002, p = 0.001) independently predicted in-hospital mortality. The calculated cutoff value of the PNI was 33.01. Conclusion: Lower PNI values are independently associated with in-hospital mortality in ATAAD. The PNI may be a useful tool for predicting the early mortality of ATAAD patients after surgical repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据