4.8 Article

Weak-to-strong transition of quantum measurement in a trapped-ion system

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0973-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. DIP (German-Israeli Project Cooperation)
  2. I-CORE Israel Center of Research Excellence programme of the ISF
  3. Crown Photonics Center
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0301903]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61632021, 11574398]
  6. Israeli Innovation Authority [70002]
  7. Quantum Science and Technology Program of the Israeli Council of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum measurement remains a puzzle through its stormy history from the birth of quantum mechanics to state-of-the-art quantum technologies. Two complementary measurement schemes have been widely investigated in a variety of quantum systems: von Neumann's projective 'strong' measurement and Aharonov's weak measurement. Here, we report the observation of a weak-to-strong measurement transition in a single trapped(40)Ca(+)ion system. The transition is realized by tuning the interaction strength between the ion's internal electronic state and its vibrational motion, which play the roles of the measured system and the measuring pointer, respectively. By pre- and post-selecting the internal state, a pointer state composed of two of the ion's motional wavepackets is obtained, and its central-position shift, which corresponds to the measurement outcome, demonstrates the transition from the weak-value asymptotes to the expectation-value asymptotes. Quantitatively, the weak-to-strong measurement transition is characterized by a universal transition factor e(-Gamma 2/2), where Gamma is a dimensionless parameter related to the system-apparatus coupling. This transition, which continuously connects weak measurements and strong measurements, may open new experimental possibilities to test quantum foundations and prompt us to re-examine and improve the measurement schemes of related quantum technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据