4.7 Article

Epigenomic analysis of Parkinson's disease neurons identifies Tet2 loss as neuroprotective

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1203-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0690-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH1810512]
  2. VAI Innovation Award
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1R21NS112614-01, 1R01NS114409-01A1, 1R01NS113894-01A1]
  4. Farmer Family Foundation Parkinson's Research Initiative
  5. Gibby AMP
  6. Friends vs. Parky Award
  7. Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W81XWH1810512] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease brain neurons exhibit a widespread epigenetic dysregulation of enhancers that is linked to an upregulation of TET2. Inactivation of TET2 protects against nigral dopaminergic neuronal loss and neuroinflammation. Parkinson's disease (PD) pathogenesis may involve the epigenetic control of enhancers that modify neuronal functions. Here, we comprehensively examine DNA methylation at enhancers, genome-wide, in neurons of patients with PD and of control individuals. We find a widespread increase in cytosine modifications at enhancers in PD neurons, which is partly explained by elevated hydroxymethylation levels. In particular, patients with PD exhibit an epigenetic and transcriptional upregulation ofTET2, a master-regulator of cytosine modification status.TET2depletion in a neuronal cell model results in cytosine modification changes that are reciprocal to those observed in PD neurons. Moreover,Tet2inactivation in mice fully prevents nigral dopaminergic neuronal loss induced by previous inflammation.Tet2loss also attenuates transcriptional immune responses to an inflammatory trigger. Thus, widespread epigenetic dysregulation of enhancers in PD neurons may, in part, be mediated by increasedTET2expression. DecreasedTet2activity is neuroprotective, in vivo, and may be a new therapeutic target for PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据