4.8 Article

Penning trap mass measurements of the deuteron and the HD+molecular ion

期刊

NATURE
卷 585, 期 7823, 页码 43-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2628-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Penning trap mass spectrometry is used to measure the masses of the deuteron and the HD(+)ion with unprecedented precision, reducing the uncertainty of the proton mass reference value. The masses of the lightest atomic nuclei and the electron mass(1)are interlinked, and their values affect observables in atomic(2), molecular(3-5)and neutrino physics(6), as well as metrology. The most precise values for these fundamental parameters come from Penning trap mass spectrometry, which achieves relative mass uncertainties of the order of 10(-11). However, redundancy checks using data from different experiments reveal considerable inconsistencies in the masses of the proton, the deuteron and the helion (the nucleus of helium-3), suggesting that the uncertainty of these values may have been underestimated. Here we present results from absolute mass measurements of the deuteron and the HD(+)molecular ion using(12)C as a mass reference. Our value for the deuteron mass, 2.013553212535(17) atomic mass units, has better precision than the CODATA value(7)by a factor of 2.4 and differs from it by 4.8 standard deviations. With a relative uncertainty of eight parts per trillion, this is the most precise mass value measured directly in atomic mass units. Furthermore, our measurement of the mass of the HD(+)molecular ion, 3.021378241561(61) atomic mass units, not only allows a rigorous consistency check of our results for the masses of the deuteron (this work) and the proton(8), but also establishes an additional link for the masses of tritium(9)and helium-3 (ref.(10)) to the atomic mass unit. Combined with a recent measurement of the deuteron-to-proton mass ratio(11), the uncertainty of the reference value of the proton mass(7)can be reduced by a factor of three.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据