4.4 Article

Relative Cost Differences of Initial Treatment Strategies for Newly Diagnosed Opioid Use Disorder A Cohort Study

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 58, 期 10, 页码 919-926

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001394

关键词

opioid use disorder; comparative cost analysis; treatment

资金

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital from the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Drug Abuse [1R01DA044526-01A1, 3UG1DA015831-17S2]
  2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [1H79TI081442-01]
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration [1T25HP37602-01]
  4. Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  5. Boston University School of Public Health
  6. American Physical Therapy Association
  7. Boston School of Public Health from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30 AG13846, 1U01AA021989, R01 AR055557]
  8. NIH via the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1U01NS093334-01, 1U01NS086659]
  9. NIH via the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [U24 AA020779, 1R01AA021335]
  10. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U01 AA020776]
  11. NIH via the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [P50 DC013027]
  12. NIH via the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [1UL1TR001430]
  13. NIH via the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [U24 MD006964]
  14. NIH via the National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA032082, R01 DA037768]
  15. Department of Defense [W81XWH-13-2-0072]
  16. Boston Medical Center from the National Institutes of Health via the National Institute on Drug Abuse [K23DA042168, UM1DA049412]
  17. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [1UL1TR001430]
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U01CE002780]
  19. Food and Drug Administration [HHSF2232009100006I]
  20. Office of National Drug Control Policy/University of Baltimore [G1799ONDCP06B]
  21. Boston University School of Medicine Department of Medicine Career Investment Award
  22. Optum-UnitedHealth Group
  23. Department of Veterans Affairs
  24. Optum via UnitedHealthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Relative costs of care among treatment options for opioid use disorder (OUD) are unknown. Methods: We identified a cohort of 40,885 individuals with a new diagnosis of OUD in a large national de-identified claims database covering commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees. We assigned individuals to 1 of 6 mutually exclusive initial treatment pathways: (1) Inpatient Detox/Rehabilitation Treatment Center; (2) Behavioral Health Intensive, intensive outpatient or Partial Hospitalization Services; (3) Methadone or Buprenorphine; (4) Naltrexone; (5) Behavioral Health Outpatient Services, or; (6) No Treatment. We assessed total costs of care in the initial 90 day treatment period for each strategy using a differences in differences approach controlling for baseline costs. Results: Within 90 days of diagnosis, 94.8% of individuals received treatment, with the initial treatments being: 15.8% for Inpatient Detox/Rehabilitation Treatment Center, 4.8% for Behavioral Health Intensive, Intensive Outpatient or Partial Hospitalization Services, 12.5% for buprenorphine/methadone, 2.4% for naltrexone, and 59.3% for Behavioral Health Outpatient Services. Average unadjusted costs increased from $3250 per member per month (SD $7846) at baseline to $5047 per member per month (SD $11,856) in the 90 day follow-up period. Compared with no treatment, initial 90 day costs were lower for buprenorphine/methadone [Adjusted Difference in Differences Cost Ratio (ADIDCR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.80], naltrexone (ADIDCR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67), and behavioral health outpatient (ADIDCR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66). Costs were higher for inpatient detox (ADIDCR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.88-2.83). Conclusion: Improving health system capacity and insurance coverage and incentives for outpatient management of OUD may reduce health care costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据