期刊
LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 151-158出版社
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0006
关键词
assessment; interviews; clinical reasoning; arm; breast cancer related lymphedema
资金
- Sydney Research Health Informatics Scholarship
Experienced lymphedema clinicians use a variety of assessments to evaluate upper limb lymphedema, with subjective and objective measures informing treatment decisions. Assessment selection is influenced by appointment duration, patient preference, resources, and treatment goals. Objective data are primarily analyzed for interlimb difference and changes over time.
Background:A variety of objective and subjective assessments are available for clinical assessment of lymphedema. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical reasoning underpinning the assessment of upper limb lymphedema by experienced lymphedema clinicians. Methods and Results:Semistructured, individual, interviews were conducted with lymphedema therapists (n = 14) from a variety of treatment settings. These interviews were conducted after observations of these therapists assessing patients with lymphedema and focused on: (1) the therapists' rationale for the assessments selected, (2) how the data were analyzed, and (3) how the information was then used. Assessment selection was guided by the purpose of the visit, patient preference, resources, and time available. Subjective measures of visible and palpated tissue changes were used to target treatment, and objective measures of circumference and bioimpedance spectroscopy and patient report of symptoms informed treatment evaluation and disease progression. Objective data collected were primarily analyzed for interlimb difference and change between appointments. Conclusions:A range of clinical assessments were used in the evaluation of lymphedema to detect the presence of lymphedema, estimate the extent of soft tissue change, understand the patient experience of lymphedema, and evaluate treatment response. A primary determinant for the collection of objective measures was the appointment duration. Current methods of data analysis and reporting do not facilitate the review of change over time.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据