4.4 Article

Site fidelity and homing behaviour in the intertidal species Chiton granosus (Polyplacophora) (Frembly 1889)

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2020.101932

关键词

Chiton; Rocky intertidal; Chemical signals; Foraging behaviour

资金

  1. FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico, Government of Chile) [1130868, 1170598]
  2. MSc Program in Marine Ecology of the Universidad Catolica de la Santisima Concepcion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Homing behaviour is frequently observed in marine intertidal invertebrate species. This behaviour may help species to deal with the environmental variability of the intertidal, providing shelter during low tides and areas to explore and search for food during high tides. The capacity of individuals to show fidelity behaviour should be an adaptive trait, due to the uncertainty that finding a new shelter in each tidal cycle implies. Chiton granosus is a common polyplacophora of the Southeastern Pacific rocky intertidal zone. During high tides, individuals move throughout the substratum in search of food; meanwhile, they are found within crevices in groups of variable sizes during low tides. According to previous works, this species shows some degree of fidelity to these shelters. Using field and laboratory experiments, we herein evaluate the factors determining the degree of site fidelity in C. granosus, taking into account the distance travelled from the shelter and food availability. Also, we evaluated the importance that chemical signs from the pedal mucus have in aiding C. granosus to return to its refuge. Field observations showed that C. granosus presents variable levels of site fidelity covering a maximum distance of 50 cm from its shelter. Laboratory results suggested that fidelity to shelters is related to the proximity of food sources. Chemical cues from the pedal mucus could be used to find the shelter after exploratory activities during high tides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据