4.6 Article

Model Catalytic Studies of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers: Indole/Indoline/Octahydroindole on Ni(111)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 41, 页码 22559-22567

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06988

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, regional Development and Energy
  2. DFG [419654270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-heterocycles belong to the class of so-called liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs), which have been identified as suitable materials for chemical hydrogen storage due to favorable hydrogen storage capacity and reaction kinetics. In this contribution, we focus on the dehydrogenation reaction of hydrogen-rich octahydroindole, its dehydrogenation intermediate indoline, and hydrogen-lean indole. Octahydroindole has a hydrogen storage capacity of 6.4 wt %, and indoline has 1.7 wt %. We investigated the mechanism of the temperature-induced dehydrogenation of the three compounds after adsorption on Ni(111) at low temperatures. Nickel is attractive as an effective and low-priced dehydrogenation catalyst, which potentially could replace more expensive Pt and Pd in industrial applications. We compare the obtained results with our previous work on Pt(111) for the same LOHC system and for N-ethylcarbazole/H-12-N-ethylcarbazole. A comprehensive understanding of the reaction mechanism was obtained by combining high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with temperature-programmed desorption lab experiments. For all three compounds, we find dehydrogenation at the nitrogen atom above 270 K (indole, >= 130 K; indoline, >240 K; octahydroindole, >270 K). For indoline and octahydroindole, we observe simultaneous dehydrogenation at the carbon atoms, resulting in an indolide surface species. For octahydroindole, small amounts of side products and decomposition products are observed throughout the reaction pathway. Above 380 K, the indolide species decomposes into fragments for all three compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据