4.8 Review

Quantum dot surface engineering: Toward inert fluorophores with compact size and bright, stable emission

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 216-237

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.03.012

关键词

Semiconductor; Nanoparticle; Photoluminescence; CdSe; Bioimaging; Probe

资金

  1. NIH [R00CA153914, R21NS087413, T32ES007326]
  2. UIUC College of Engineering Strategic Research Initiatives Program
  3. National Science Foundation [OCI-0725070, ACI-1238993]
  4. state of Illinois

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surfaces of colloidal nanocrystals are complex interfaces between solid crystals, coordinating ligands, and liquid solutions. For fluorescent quantum dots, the properties of the surface vastly influence the efficiency of light emission, stability, and physical interactions, and thus determine their sensitivity and specificity when they are used to detect and image biological molecules. But after more than 30 years of study, the surfaces of quantum dots remain poorly understood and continue to be an important subject of both experimental and theoretical research. In this article, we review the physics and chemistry of quantum dot surfaces and describe approaches to engineer optimal fluorescent probes for applications in biomolecular imaging and sensing. We describe the structure and electronic properties of crystalline facets, the chemistry of ligand coordination, and the impact of ligands on optical properties. We further describe recent advances in compact coatings that have significantly improved their properties by providing small hydrodynamic size, high stability and fluorescence efficiency, and minimal nonspecific interactions with cells and biological molecules. While major progress has been made in both basic and applied research, many questions remain in the chemistry and physics of quantum dot surfaces that have hindered key breakthroughs to fully optimize their properties. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据