4.5 Article

A lncRNA prognostic signature associated with immune infiltration and tumour mutation burden in breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 21, 页码 12444-12456

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15762

关键词

bioinformatics; breast cancer; immune infiltration; lncRNA; prognosis

资金

  1. Clinical Research Physician Program of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology [5001530053]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672940]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current studies have shown that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may serve as prognostic biomarkers in multiple cancers. Therefore, we postulated that expression patterns of multiple lncRNAs combined into a single signature could improve clinicopathological risk stratification and prediction of overall survival rate for breast cancer patients. Two algorithms, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation (LASSO) and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), were used to select candidate lncRNAs. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to construct a seven-lncRNA signature for breast cancer. Stratified analysis revealed that the signature was significantly associated with multiple clinicopathological risk factors. For clinical use, we developed a nomogram model to predict overall survival and odds of death for breast cancer patients. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), CIBERSORT algorithm and ESTIMATE method were employed to assess the relative immune cell infiltrations of each sample. Differentially infiltration of immune cells and diverse tumour mutation burden (TMB) scores might give rise to the efficacy of lncRNA signature for predicting the overall survival of patients. Correlation analysis implied that LINC01215 was associated with multiple immune-related signalling pathways. A seven-lncRNA prognostic signature is a reliable tool to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据