4.7 Article

Properties of pervious concrete containing recycled concrete block aggregate and recycled concrete aggregate

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 15-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.060

关键词

Pervious concrete; Recycled aggregate; Total void; Compressive strength; Surface abrasion

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand
  2. Office of the Higher Education Commission through the Advanced Functional Materials Cluster of Khon Kaen University
  3. Khon Kaen University
  4. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under the TRF Senior Research Scholar Contract [RTA5780004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The properties of pervious concretes containing two types of recycled aggregates viz., recycled concrete block aggregate (RBA) and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) were studied. They were incorporated in pervious concretes by replacing natural aggregate at the levels of 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% by weight. Compressive strength, density, total void, water permeability, thermal conductivity and surface abrasion resistance of pervious concrete containing the aggregates were determined. Both RBA and RCA increased the compressive strengths of pervious concretes except at the high replacement level of 100%. The incorporation of RCA at all replacement levels increased the surface abrasion resistance of pervious concrete. For RBA, the improvement in surface abrasion resistance was obtained with only up to 20% replacement level. Although the recycled aggregates were weaker than natural aggregate, the improvements in strength and abrasion resistance were achieved as a result of a better bonding between recycled aggregate and cement paste due to increased surface porosity and roughness of recycled aggregates. The improvements in strength and surface abrasion resistance are important for the utilization of pervious concrete. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据