4.6 Article

Comparison of ozone vertical profiles in the upper troposphere-stratosphere measured over Tomsk, Russia (56.5° N, 85.0° E) with DIAL, MLS, and IASI

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 41, 期 22, 页码 8590-8609

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1782506

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [AAAA-A17-117021310142-5]
  2. Russian Federation [SP-3926.2018.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser ranging methods employing light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology are widely used for studying the atmosphere and monitoring its state. The purpose of this work is to measure the ozone vertical distribution (OVD) in the upper troposphere-stratosphere by differential absorption LiDAR (DIAL) at 299-341 nm and 308-353 nm and to compare the results with satellite data. A LiDAR complex for measuring the OVD in the altitude range approximately 5-45 km has been created. Here, we analyse the results of ozone LiDAR measurements at wavelengths of 299-341 nm and 308-353 nm between 2017 and 2018 at Siberian LiDAR Station (SLS) and compare them with satellite (Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS)/Aura and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI)/MetOp) measurements of OVD. The retrieved LiDAR OVD profiles in the upper troposphere-stratosphere in comparison with MLS/Aura and IASI/MetOp profiles, as well as the stitched OVD profile in comparison with the mid-latitude Krueger model, confirm the prospects of using the pairs of ozone sounding wavelengths 299-341 nm and 308-353 nm. The average relative difference between LiDAR and MLS/Aura measurements is negative in the altitude range 16-38 km and attains -49.81% at 38 km, and also, the average relative difference between LiDAR and IASI/MetOp measurements is positive in the altitude ranges 6 and 7.40 to 18 km, where it attains 43.68% at 16.80 km, and is negative in the altitude range 6-7.30 km, where it attains - 43.86% at 6.20 km.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据