4.7 Review

New Insights into Therapy-Induced Progression of Cancer

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21217872

关键词

cancer progression; chemotherapy; chemoresistance; tumor microenvironment; intercellular communication; cell cycle; EMT; autophagy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2019-1669]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-75-10123]
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  4. [17-00-00172]
  5. [20-04-00804]
  6. [17-29-06056]
  7. Russian Science Foundation [19-75-10123] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The malignant tumor is a complex heterogeneous set of cells functioning in a no less heterogeneous microenvironment. Like any dynamic system, cancerous tumors evolve and undergo changes in response to external influences, including therapy. Initially, most tumors are susceptible to treatment. However, remaining cancer cells may rapidly reestablish the tumor after a temporary remission. These new populations of malignant cells usually have increased resistance not only to the first-line agent, but also to the second- and third-line drugs, leading to a significant decrease in patient survival. Multiple studies describe the mechanism of acquired therapy resistance. In past decades, it became clear that, in addition to the simple selection of pre-existing resistant clones, therapy induces a highly complicated and tightly regulated molecular response that allows tumors to adapt to current and even subsequent therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes mechanisms of acquired resistance, such as secondary genetic alterations, impaired function of drug transporters, and autophagy. Moreover, we describe less obvious molecular aspects of therapy resistance in cancers, including epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, cell cycle alterations, and the role of intercellular communication. Understanding these molecular mechanisms will be beneficial in finding novel therapeutic approaches for cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据