4.7 Article

Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21175949

关键词

semen; extracellular vesicles; exosomes; microvesicles; extracellular vesicle isolation methods; extracellular vesicle miRNA analysis; biomarker; diagnosis; prostate cancer

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias)/Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional Una manera de hacer Europa (FIS/FEDER) [PI15/00153, DTS18/00101]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR191]
  3. Researchers Consolidation Program (ISCIII SNS/Dpt. Salut Generalitat de Catalunya) [CES09/020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them.ExoGAG 3500x gand themiRCURY Cell/Urine/CSF 1500xgmethods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures toUCfor isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据