4.7 Article

Co-useof organic herbal residue and red mud waste for syngas production by chemical looping gasification

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 2195-2210

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5912

关键词

chemical looping gasification; herbal medicine residual; red mud oxygen carrier; syngas production

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2017-K16]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806240]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180648, BK20180645]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that chemical looping gasification technology can effectively convert organic waste into syngas and inorganic waste into usable products, providing a new method for the utilization of waste resources.
Tremendous amounts of organic residue from manufacturing herbal medicines and inorganic red mud waste from mining bauxite ores are landfilled each year in China. To study the potential for their beneficial co-use, chemical looping gasification (CLG) was tested in which the organic residue was used as the fuel and the red mud was the oxygen carrier that is needed for CLG. Parametric testing was performed using a thermo-gravimetric analyzer and a bench-scale fluidized bed reactor to optimize CLG operations that could maximum syngas production, enrich H(2)concentrations and obtain effective conversion of the residue. Physical and chemical characterization of the organic residue and red mud before and after CLG testing showed that some filamentous ash from the organic residue remained on the surface after testing, and potassium from the organic residue migrated onto the surface of the oxygen carrier. The characterization and testing results suggested that CLG may be an advantageous technology to effectively convert an organic waste into syngas and an inorganic waste into a usable product, thereby establishing an approach for beneficial waste resource utilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据