4.6 Article

Multifunctional ZIF-67@SiO2 Membrane for High Efficiency Removal of Particulate Matter and Toxic Gases

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 40, 页码 17876-17884

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03091

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21921006, 21878148]
  2. Key Industrial R&D International Cooperation Project [BZ2018004]
  3. Industry Prospect and Key Technology Project [BE2019117]
  4. Blue Project for Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multifunctional air filtration membrane is urgently required for high efficiency removal of particulate matter (PM) and capture of airborne toxic gases (SO2, NOx, VOCs, etc.). Zeolite imidazole frameworks (ZIFs), as a subclass of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), hold promise for poisonous pollutant capture due to their excellent adsorption performance and high thermal and chemical stability. Here, a facile strategy is demonstrated to synthesize a multifunctional air filtration membrane through in situ growth of ZIF-67 nanoparticles on a flexible silica nanofiber membrane (ZIF-67@SiO2 NFM), which significantly improved the contact area of the membrane with SO2 and PM. When it underwent a standard PM removal test, the prepared ZIF-67@SiO2 NFM showed the highest PM2.5 removal efficiency of 100% at a relatively low pressure drop of 335 Pa with the impregnation time being 24 h. At the same time, due to the load of ZIF-67, the SO2 adsorption capacity up to 1013 mg/g could be realized in the obtained membrane when exposed to a SO2/N-2 mixed flow with a humidity of 55%. Furthermore, during the incense smoke experiment, the PM2.5 filtering efficiency of the prepared ZIF-67@SiO2 membrane could reach 98.9% under an initial concentration of 1000 mu g.m(-3). This work proposes a simple and practical strategy to not only prepare a high-performance multifunctional nanofiber membrane but also achieve the capture of SO2 and PM with high efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据