4.4 Review

The effect of unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis on Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) level after 3 and 6 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01561-3

关键词

Laparoscopy; Unilateral; Bilateral; Endometriosis; AMH; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Student Research Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
  2. Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR) [3009261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Endometriosis is one of the most common causes of infertility. The causes of the disease and its definitive treatments are still unclear. Moreover, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) is a glycoprotein dimer that is a member of the transient growth factors family. This research work aimed to identify the effect of unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis on AMH levels after 3 months, and 6 months, using meta-analysis. Methods In this study, the articles published in national and international databases of SID, MagIran, IranMedex, IranDoc, Cochrane, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science (ISI) were searched to find electronically published studies between 2010 and 2019. The heterogeneous index between studies was determined using the I(2)index. Results In this meta-analysis and systematic review, 19 articles were eligible for inclusion in the study. The standardized mean difference was obtained in examining of unilateral laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis (before intervention 2.8 +/- 0.11, and after 3 months 2.05 +/- 0.13; and before intervention 3.1 +/- 0.46 and after 6 months 2.08 +/- 0.31), and in examining bilateral laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis examination (before intervention 2.0 +/- 08.08, and after 3 months 1.1 +/- 0.1; and before intervention 2.9 +/- 0.23 and after 6 months 1.4 +/- 0.19). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis is effective on AMH levels, and the level decreases in both comparisons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据