4.7 Article

Impact of sleep on female and male reproductive functions: a systematic review

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 115, 期 3, 页码 715-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1429

关键词

Sleep; ovarian function; sperm parameters; fertility; chronotype

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results of the study suggest that sleep parameters may affect female and male reproductive functions, with short sleep duration, evening chronotype, or shift/night work schedules potentially impacting fertility and IVF outcomes. However, due to heterogeneous study methodologies, the results were difficult to compare.
Objective: To evaluate the association of sleep parameters on female and male reproductive functions. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Female and male individuals, either healthy or infertile. Intervention(s): Relevant articles were identified according to the The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses recommendations in the PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2000 to June 8, 2020. Main Outcome Measure(s): The association between sleep and ovary function, spermatic function, natural fertility, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes was assessed. Result(s): A total of 33 studies that looked at the association between sleep and either ovary function (n = 10), spermatic function (n = 12), natural fertility (n = 5), or IVF outcomes (n = 6) were included. Overall, female and male fertility, as well as IVF outcomes may be affected by short sleep duration, evening chronotype, or shift/night work schedules. However, the results were hardly comparable due to the heterogeneous study methodologies used. Conclusion(s): Sleep may be an original and innovative parameter to consider in the reproduction field. Further investigation is needed to elucidate how sleep and fertility are interrelated and how sleep might constitute a useful modifiable target in infertility management. (C) 2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据