4.6 Review

Intestinal permeation enhancers to improve oral bioavailability of macromolecules: reasons for low efficacy in humans

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 273-300

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1825375

关键词

Intestinal permeability; oral peptide delivery; intestinal permeation enhancers; intestinal epithelium; oral bioavailability

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) CURAM Centre for Medical Devices [13/RC/2073]
  2. SFI BiOrbic Centre for Bioeconomy [16/RC/3889]
  3. EU Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the reasons for sub-optimal bioavailability of macromolecules from PE dosage forms and suggests approaches to improve performance in humans. Optimization of co-localization of the PE with the macromolecule at the epithelial surface is crucial for effective permeation enhancement. Innovative delivery systems have been developed to overcome challenges in achieving optimal co-localization in the GI tract.
Introduction Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are substances that transiently alter the intestinal epithelial barrier to facilitate permeation of macromolecules with low oral bioavailability (BA). While a number of PEs have progressed to clinical testing in conventional formulations with macromolecules, there has been only low single digit increases in oral BA, irrespective of whether the drug met primary or secondary clinical endpoints. Areas covered This article considers the causes of sub-optimal BA of macromolecules from PE dosage forms and suggests approaches that may improve performance in humans. Expert opinion Permeation enhancement is most effective when the PE is co-localized with the macromolecule at the epithelial surface. Conditions in the GI tract impede optimal co-localization. Novel delivery systems that limit dilution and spreading of the PE and macromolecule in the small intestine have attempted to replicate promising enhancement efficacy observed in static drug delivery models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据