4.6 Article

How functional network connectivity changes as a result of lesion and recovery: An investigation of the network phenotype of stroke

期刊

CORTEX
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 17-41

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.011

关键词

Stroke recovery; Neuroplasticity; Language deficit; Functional connectivity; Functional network

资金

  1. National Institute on Deafness and OtherCommunicationDisorders [DC012283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study, through a series of univariate and multivariate (classification) analyses, investigated fMRI task-based functional connectivity (FC) at pre- and post-treatment timepoints in 18 individuals with chronic post-stroke dysgraphia. The investigation examined the effects of lesion and treatment-based recovery on functional organization, focusing on both inter-hemispheric (homotopic) and intra-hemispheric connectivity. The work confirmed, in the chronic stage, the network phenotype of stroke injury proposed by Siegel et al. (2016) consisting of abnormally low inter-hemispheric connectivity as well as abnormally high intra-hemispheric (ipsilesional) connectivity. In terms of recovery-based changes in FC, this study found overall hyper-normalization of these abnormal inter and intra-hemispheric connectivity patterns, suggestive of over-correction. Specifically, treatment-related homotopic FC increases were observed between left and right dorsal frontal-parietal regions. With regard to intra-hemispheric connections, recovery was dominated by increased ipsilateral connectivity between frontal and parietal regions along with decreased connectivity between the frontal regions and posterior parietal-occipitaltemporal areas. Both inter and intra-hemispheric changes were associated with treatment-driven improvements in spelling performance. We suggest an interpretation according to which, with treatment, as posterior orthographic processing areas become more effective, executive control from frontal-parietal networks becomes less necessary. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据