4.7 Article

Mobile augmented reality to support fuselage assembly

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106712

关键词

Augmented reality; Mixed reality; Markerless tracking; Hand-held mobile device; Aeronautical structural assembly; Industry 4.0

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/20358-0]
  2. FCT, Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/50021/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One major manufacturing challenge of the fourth industrial revolution is the quality of product development information used in the assembly line. One of the most studied information visualization technologies is Augmented Reality (AR), whose deployment via mobile devices is currently being promoted. However, the industrial sector still has doubts regarding the technology's maturity and the costs incurred by such production processes, restricting its deployment in production environments. Thus, in the present study, we statistically analyze a markerless AR application, using a hand-held mobile device, that addresses the requirements of the structural assemblies used in aeronautical industries comparing them to those of traditional assembly methods. The main technological benefits and limitations of such applications are identified. To perform this analysis, we conducted a field evaluation where qualified professionals marked the positions of small brackets in an aeronautical structure by using AR. After collecting the time and measurement data for each bracket's position, a statistical analysis was performed to compare these positionings against those achieved using a traditional, metric scale-based method. The results indicate that AR offers a faster solution for highly complex assemblies, despite several limitations regarding the positioning tolerance when using the technology. As a future study, several application modifications are suggested to reduce markup errors and overall usage time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据