4.3 Article

Use and outcomes of thePKPapyrus covered stent in France:SOS PKPapyrus Registry

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29328

关键词

coronary aneurysm; coronary perforation; covered stent; outcomes; Papyrus

资金

  1. Fundacio Privada Daniel Bravo Andreu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of PK Papyrus covered stents in patients with coronary artery perforation. The results showed high rates of delivery and procedural success with PKP, with a high rate of target lesion revascularization observed during long-term follow-up.
Objectives To evaluate the rate of procedural success and long-term outcomes of the PK Papyrus (PKP) covered stent (CS). Background CS are essential in the treatment of coronary artery perforation (CAP). They have also been used to treat coronary artery aneurysms. Limited evidence is available on clinical outcomes with the PKP. Methods This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective, and prospective study. Consecutive patients undergoing intentional PKP implantation in 22 centers in France were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of procedural success. Secondary endpoints included rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), in-stent restenosis (ISR), and stent thrombosis (ST). Results Data from 130 patients were analyzed (mean age 72.5 +/- 10.5 years; 71% men). The main indication for PKP was CAP, in 84 patients (65%). Delivery success was achieved in 95% and procedural success in 91%. During the in-hospital stay, 15 patients died (12%) and 7 (5%) presented with ST. Data from 127 patients were available at 19.2 +/- 12.8 month follow-up. Thirty-three patients died (26%), 15 (12%) had an MI and 21 (17%) presented with TLR. TLR was due to ISR in 12 patients (9%), 10 had definite ST (8%) and 1 patient for stent under-expansion. Conclusions The principal indication for PKP was CAP. PKP had high rates of delivery and procedural success. At long-term follow-up, there was a high rate of TLR, mainly due to ISR and ST. These results are consistent with previously reported data in these clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据