4.5 Article

Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation from pH-Neutral Water by a Flexible Tri-Component Composite

期刊

CATALYSIS LETTERS
卷 151, 期 6, 页码 1700-1706

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-020-03427-1

关键词

Copper oxide nanowire; Reduce graphene oxide; Polypyrrole; Photocathode; Water reduction catalysis

资金

  1. Iraq Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Scheme [CE140100012]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC)-Linkage, Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities (LIEF) Grant [LE160100063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work examines the advantages of using carefully designed tri-component composites to fabricate flexible photocathode electrodes for photo-electrocatalytic hydrogen generation. The tri-component composite thin film showed significantly improved photocurrent performance compared to bi-component controls, harnessing the strengths of each component effectively.
In this work we examine the benefits of using carefully designed tri-component composites to fabricate flexible photocathode electrodes for photo-electrocatalytic hydrogen (H-2) generation from neutral pH water. We report H(2)production by a tri-component composite thin-film containing CuO nanowires (CuO NW), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and polypyrrole (PPy). At - 1.1 V vs Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M Na2SO4(pH 6.8) with a hole-scavenger, under weak light illumination, he photocurrent performance was fivefold greater than the bi-component CuO-rGO control having the same absolute quantities of CuO and rGO. It was 30-fold greater than the CuO-PPy control. The tri-component CuO-rGO-PPy thin film therefore displayed an active H-2-generating capacity compare with its bi-component analogues. It, effectively, exploited the advantages of each component, including the suppression of charge recombination afforded by the rGO, and the photocorrosion protection, immobilization and flexibility afforded by the PPy, whilst avoiding their disadvantages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据