4.3 Article

Enhanced filtration performance usingfeed-and-bleedconfiguration for purification of antibody precipitates

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3082

关键词

antibody; continuous processing; feed and bleed; microfiltration; precipitation

资金

  1. Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems [1705642]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1705642] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the use of a feed-and-bleed configuration to increase the effective conversion in a hollow fiber module for more efficient washing of precipitates. Experimental data supported the feasibility of achieving 90% conversion with minimal fouling, and model calculations were consistent with the experimental results.
Precipitation can be used for the initial purification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with the soluble host cell proteins removed in the permeate by tangential flow microfiltration. The objective of this study was to examine the use of a feed-and-bleed configuration to increase the effective conversion (ratio of permeate to feed flow rates) in the hollow fiber module to enable more effective washing of the precipitate. Experiments were performed using human serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) precipitates formed with 10 mM zinc chloride and 7 wt% polyethylene glycol. The critical flux was evaluated as a function of the shear rate and IgG concentration, with the resulting correlation used to predict conditions that can achieve 90% conversion in a single pass with minimal fouling. Experimental data for both the start-up and steady-state performance are in good agreement with model calculations. These results were used to analyze the performance of an enhanced continuous precipitation-microfiltration process using the feed-and-bleed configuration for the initial capture / purification of a mAb product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据