4.8 Article

Allosteric Inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: Insights from Mass Spectrometry Based Assays

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 52, 页码 23544-23548

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202010316

关键词

allosteric inhibitors; drug development; proteases; native mass spectrometry; SARS-CoV-2

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/N020413/1]
  2. European Research Council Advanced Grant ENABLE [695511]
  3. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [104633/Z/14/Z]
  4. Royal Society
  5. European Commission
  6. Oxford Glycobiology Institute Endowment
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M011224/1]
  8. Oxford-GSK-Crick Doctoral Program in Chemical Biology, EPSRC [EP/R512060/1]
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Wellcome Trust
  11. Medical Research Council
  12. University of Oxford COVID-19 Research Response fund [BRD00230]
  13. EPSRC [EP/R512060/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. MRC [MR/N020413/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M-pro) cleaves along the two viral polypeptides to release non-structural proteins required for viral replication. M-Pro is an attractive target for antiviral therapies to combat the coronavirus-2019 disease. Here, we used native mass spectrometry to characterize the functional unit of M-pro. Analysis of the monomer/dimer equilibria reveals a dissociation constant of K-d=0.14 +/- 0.03 mu M, indicating M-Pro has a strong preference to dimerize in solution. We characterized substrate turnover rates by following temporal changes in the enzyme-substrate complexes, and screened small molecules, that bind distant from the active site, for their ability to modulate activity. These compounds, including one proposed to disrupt the dimer, slow the rate of substrate processing by approximate to 35 %. This information, together with analysis of thex-ray crystal structures, provides a starting point for the development of more potent molecules that allosterically regulate M-Pro activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据