4.7 Article

Design of carbon/epoxy-aluminum hybrid upper arm of the pantograph of high-speed trains using adhesive bonding technique

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 538-545

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.079

关键词

Pantograph; Thermal analysis; Adhesive bonding; Weight reduction; Stiffness

资金

  1. R&D program - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning of the Korean government [PK1601D]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [PK1601D] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20152813260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The upper arm of a steel pantograph was replaced by a high stiffness carbon/epoxy composite-aluminum hybrid structure to enhance the mechanical performance of a pantograph for high-speed trains. By considering driving conditions such as high voltage discharge and a wide range of environmental temperatures, the composite laminates were applied to the inner surface of an aluminum pipe by using adhesive bonding with an epoxy adhesive. The bending stiffness of the slender arm structure was the most important mechanical performance criterion; therefore, only simple stacking sequences ([0](10T), [+/- 5](5T), [+/- 10](5T)), which guarantee the higher bending stiffness, were tried to determine the mechanical performance such as maximum deflection and natural frequency. Thermal stress due to environmental temperature (-35 degrees C to 65 degrees C) was also evaluated by finite element analysis. The generated stresses in the bonding layers were closely investigated, and it was found that the maximum stress was below 60% of the material strength of the epoxy adhesive under various temperature conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据