4.8 Article

Metal Halide Perovskite Nanorods: Shape Matters

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 46, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202002736

关键词

growth mechanisms; metal halide perovskites; nanorods; optical properties; optoelectronics

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE160100589]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675322, 61605109, 61735004]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0401702]
  4. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19010500600]
  5. National Science Foundation of China/Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [N_CityU108/17]
  6. Talent Introduction Plan of Overseas Top Ranking Professors by the State Administration of Foreign Expert Affairs [MSBJLG040]
  7. Croucher Foundation of Hong Kong
  8. Australian Research Council [DE160100589] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quasi-1D metal halide perovskite nanorods (NRs) are emerging as a type of materials with remarkable optical and electronic properties. Research into this field is rapidly expanding and growing in the past several years, with significant advances in both mechanistic studies of their growth and widespread possible applications. Here, the recent advances in 1D metal halide perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) are reviewed, with a particular emphasis on NRs. At first, the crystal structures of perovskites are elaborated, which is followed by a review of the major synthetic approaches toward perovskite NRs, such as wet-chemical synthesis, substrate-assisted growth, and anion exchange reactions, and discussion of the growth mechanisms associated with each synthetic method. Then, thermal and aqueous stability and the linear polarized luminescence of perovskite NRs are considered, followed by highlighting their applications in solar cells, light-emitting diodes, photodetectors/phototransistors, and lasers. Finally, challenges and future opportunities in this rapidly developing research area are summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据