4.7 Article

Single-cell sequencing of genomic DNA resolves sub-clonal heterogeneity in a melanoma cell line

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-1044-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. 10x Genomics
  2. Department of Translational Genomics, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center of Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California
  3. Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed shallow single-cell sequencing of genomic DNA across 1475 cells from a cell-line, COLO829, to resolve overall complexity and clonality. This melanoma tumor-line has been previously characterized by multiple technologies and is a benchmark for evaluating somatic alterations. In some of these studies, COLO829 has shown conflicting and/or indeterminate copy number and, thus, single-cell sequencing provides a tool for gaining insight. Following shallow single-cell sequencing, we first identified at least four major sub-clones by discriminant analysis of principal components of single-cell copy number data. Based on clustering, break-point and loss of heterozygosity analysis of aggregated data from sub-clones, we identified distinct hallmark events that were validated within bulk sequencing and spectral karyotyping. In summary, COLO829 exhibits a classical Dutrillaux's monosomic/trisomic pattern of karyotype evolution with endoreduplication, where consistent sub-clones emerge from the loss/gain of abnormal chromosomes. Overall, our results demonstrate how shallow copy number profiling can uncover hidden biological insights. Through shallow single-cell sequencing of genomic DNA followed by clustering analysis, Velazquez-Villarreal et al. reveal sub-clones of the melanoma cell line COLO829 and further identify and validate chromosome translocations and copy number changes. This study illustrates how copy number variation analysis can provide insights into cancer cell heterogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据