4.3 Article

Validation of coding algorithms for the identification of patients hospitalized for alcoholic hepatitis using administrative data

期刊

BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0348-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates-Health Solution
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Canadian Liver Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Epidemiologic studies of alcoholic hepatitis (AH) have been hindered by the lack of a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding algorithm for use with administrative data. Our objective was to validate coding algorithms for AH using a hospitalization database. Methods: The Hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) was used to identify consecutive adults (>= 18 years) hospitalized in the Calgary region with a diagnosis code for AH (ICD-10, K70.1) between 01/2008 and 08/2012. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of AH, defined as a history of heavy alcohol consumption, elevated AST and/or ALT (<300 U/L), serum bilirubin >34 mu mol/L, and elevated INR. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the diagnosis field in which the code was recorded (primary vs. secondary) and AH severity. Algorithms that incorporated ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis and its complications were also examined. Results: Of 228 potential AH cases, 122 patients had confirmed AH, corresponding to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 54 % (95 % CI 47-60 %). PPV improved when AH was the primary versus a secondary diagnosis (67 % vs. 21 %; P < 0.001). Algorithms that included diagnosis codes for ascites (PPV 75 %; 95 % CI 63-86 %), cirrhosis (PPV 60 %; 47-73 %), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (PPV 62 %; 51-73 %) had improved performance, however, the prevalence of these diagnoses in confirmed AH cases was low (29-39 %). Conclusions: In conclusion the low PPV of the diagnosis code for AH suggests that caution is necessary if this hospitalization database is used in large-scale epidemiologic studies of this condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据