4.7 Article

The Nitric Oxide System in Peripheral Artery Disease: Connection with Oxidative Stress and Biopterins

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox9070590

关键词

tetrahydrobiopterin; dihydrobiopterin; endothelial dysfunction

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [R01AG034995, R01AG049868, R01AG064420]
  2. American Heart Association [17SDG33630088]
  3. Charles and Mary Heider Fund for Excellence in Vascular Surgery (Omaha, NE. USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) pathophysiology extends beyond hemodynamics to include other operating mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction. Oxidative stress may be linked to endothelial dysfunction by reducing nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. We aimed to investigate whether the NO system and its regulators are altered in the setting of PAD and to assess the relationship between NO bioavailability and oxidative stress. Sera from 35 patients with intermittent claudication (IC), 26 patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 35 non-PAD controls were analyzed to determine levels of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), dihydrobiopterin (BH2), nitrate/nitrite (nitric oxides, or NOx), arginine, citrulline, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), and the oxidative stress markers 8-Oxo-2 '-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and protein carbonyls. NOx was significantly lower in IC and CLI patients compared to controls in association with elevated oxidative stress, with the greatest NOx reductions observed in CLI. Compared with controls, IC and CLI patients had reduced BH4, elevated BH2, and a reduced BH4/BH2 ratio. SDMA, the arginine/SDMA ratio, and the arginine/ADMA ratio were significantly higher in CLI patients. The NO system and its regulators are significantly compromised in PAD. This dysregulation appears to be driven by increased oxidative stress and worsens as the disease progresses from claudication to CLI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据