4.6 Article

Studies on the Potential of Nonmodified and Metal Oxide-Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites For Adsorption of Heavy Metals and Catalytic Degradation of Organics for Waste Water Recovery

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr8070778

关键词

coal fly ash zeolites; heavy metals; wastewater remediation; Fenton oxidation

资金

  1. National Science Fund, Ministry of Education, and Science of R. Bulgaria under the Grant DNTS Slovak Republic [01/6]
  2. Technical University of Sofia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nanocrystalline zeolite of Na-X type (CFAZ) was synthesized by ultrasonic-assisted double stage fusion-hydrothermal alkaline conversion of lignite coal fly ash. Modified CFAZ with magnetic nanoparticles (MNP-CFAZ) was obtained by adding presynthesized magnetic nanoparticles between the synthesis stages. CFAZs loaded by particles of copper (Cu-CFAZ) and cobalt (Co-CFAZ) oxides were prepared by postsynthesis modification of the parent CFAZ, applying a wet impregnation technique. The parent and modified CFAZs were examined for their phase composition by X-ray diffraction, morphology by scanning electron microscopy, and surface characteristics by N(2)physisorption. Comparative studies have been carried out on the adsorption capacity of the starting CFAZ and its derivatives with respect to Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions from aqueous solutions. Adsorption isotherms of Cd2+-ions on the studied samples were plotted and described by the adsorption equations of Langmuir, Freundlich, Langmuir-Freundlich, and Temkin. The best correlation between the experimental and model isotherms for the parent and modified CFAZ was found with the Langmuir linear model, assuming a monolayer adsorption mechanism. Parent and modified CFAZs were also studied as catalysts for heterogeneous thermal Fenton oxidation of methylene blue. At 90 degrees C, the higher catalytic activity exhibits the nonmodified sample, but with the decrease in temperature to 60 degrees C, the modified samples are more effective catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据