4.6 Article

Tight Uniform Continuity Bounds for Quantum Entropies: Conditional Entropy, Relative Entropy Distance and Energy Constraints

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
卷 347, 期 1, 页码 291-313

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-016-2609-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU (STREP RAQUEL)
  2. ERC (AdG IRQUAT)
  3. Spanish MINECO [FIS2013-40627-P]
  4. FEDER funds
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya CIRIT [2014-SGR-966]
  6. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a bouquet of continuity bounds for quantum entropies, falling broadly into two classes: first, a tight analysis of the Alicki-Fannes continuity bounds for the conditional von Neumann entropy, reaching almost the best possible form that depends only on the system dimension and the trace distance of the states. Almost the same proof can be used to derive similar continuity bounds for the relative entropy distance from a convex set of states or positive operators. As applications, we give new proofs, with tighter bounds, of the asymptotic continuity of the relative entropy of entanglement, E (R) , and its regularization , as well as of the entanglement of formation, E (F) . Using a novel quantum coupling of density operators, which may be of independent interest, we extend the latter to an asymptotic continuity bound for the regularized entanglement of formation, aka entanglement cost, . Second, we derive analogous continuity bounds for the von Neumann entropy and conditional entropy in infinite dimensional systems under an energy constraint, most importantly systems of multiple quantum harmonic oscillators. While without an energy bound the entropy is discontinuous, it is well-known to be continuous on states of bounded energy. However, a quantitative statement to that effect seems not to have been known. Here, under some regularity assumptions on the Hamiltonian, we find that, quite intuitively, the Gibbs entropy at the given energy roughly takes the role of the Hilbert space dimension in the finite-dimensional Fannes inequality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据