4.6 Article

Superparamagnetism of Green Emissive Cs4PbBr6 Zero-Dimensional Perovskite Crystals

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 2208-2216

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00964

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2019R1A6A1A10073079]
  2. NRF - Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032462]
  3. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes through the NRF - MSIT [NRF-2018M1A2A2063349]
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [C030370] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018M1A2A2063349] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the characteristic magnetic behaviors of nonemissive (N416) and green emissive (G416) Cs4PbBr6 perovskite crystals. N416 exhibits a diamagnetic behavior, while G416 shows an additional superparamagnetic behavior, demonstrating the existence of paramagnetic electron spins in the G416. Although G416 and N416 crystals belong to the same rhombohedra unit cell with zero-dimensional (0D) connectivity of the [PbBr6](4-) octahedron, the G416 crystal has a smaller unit cell volume than N416. Cs-133 magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy demonstrated the presence of defects in G416 and the extremely low concentration of a CsPbBr3 phase in both crystals. The DFT calculation results for the defected N416 crystal structure possessing Br vacancies included the experimentally observed blue shift of the high-energy optical band in the G416, which reinforces the existence of intrinsic defects in the G416. Our findings reveal that the unusual green emission and paramagnetic domains stem from structural defects in the 0D perovskites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据