4.5 Article

Synthesis and magnetic properties of chromium doped cobalt ferrite nanotubes

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/abae26

关键词

hollow nanotubes; coercivity; surface effect; anisotropy; magnetic

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11664023]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals of China
  3. Longyuan Youth Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project [2020RCXM125]
  4. Gansu Province Higher Colleges Innovation Ability Enhancement Project [2020B-375, 2019A-248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromium (Cr) doped cobalt ferrite (Co1-xCrxFe2O4:x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, denoted as to CCFO) hollow nanotubes were synthesized by electrospinnig method followed by, calcining treatment at 700 degrees C in air. The samples exhibited a single phase cubic spinel phase. The lattice constant of the samples was found to initially decreased and thereafter increases with increased of Cr content. The morphology analysis indicated that the samples displayed a disordered arrangements of hollow structures and the relevant surfaces were rough and porous. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) paragraph confirmed that the doped CCFO nanotubes had a polycrystalline nature and exhibited the changes in the corresponding crystal structure. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed that Cr doping affect the crystal structure and atomic-binding energy. The analysis of magnetic hysteresis loop indicated an obvious reduction in the saturation magnetization (Ms) of cobalt ferrite with increasing in Cr substitution. The remanent magnetization (Mr) and coercivity were increased at first and then decreased with increasing of Cr content, which was elucidated by the surface effect and magnetic moment direction. The switching field distribution analysis indicated the magnetically crystal soft phase and there were multiple-step processes to reach magnetic reversal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据