4.1 Article

Winter severity and anthropogenic factors affect spatial behaviour of red deer in the Carpathians

期刊

MAMMAL RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 815-823

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-020-00520-z

关键词

Cervus elaphus; Habitat selection; Home range; Migration; Roads; Supplementary feeding; Western Carpathians

类别

资金

  1. European Commission within its Center of Excellence project IBAES [EVK2-CT-2002-80009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial ecology of red deerCervus elaphusis shaped by both natural and anthropogenic factors. We used radio telemetry to investigate factors affecting habitat selection on two spatial scales, home range sizes and migratory behaviour of red deer (N = 8 individuals) in two mountain ranges of the western Carpathians in 2004-2007. The two study areas differed in terms of environmental conditions: Beskid Sadecki had higher altitudes, higher human population and road density and milder winters than Beskid Niski. Red deer in both areas selected forests and avoided agricultural habitats on both spatial scales. Elevation affected site selection only in Beskid Sadecki: deer selected higher altitudes for their home ranges, but lower altitudes within them. Deer avoided major roads when selecting their home ranges in both sites, but only in Beskid Sadecki, they also avoided roads within their home ranges. Deer in both study sites selected locations closer to supplementary feeding sites in winter. In years with more severe winters, deer in Beskid Niski displayed seasonal migration to south-facing slopes. Deer in Beskid Sadecki showed short-distance altitudinal movements from low elevations in winter to high elevations in summer, and a short-term descent to low elevations in August-September. Our results fit the general concept that climatic conditions and human-related factors shape spatial behaviour in ungulates, and that snow conditions are particularly important for migration. Climate change will likely contribute to diminishing migration in red deer in the Carpathians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据