4.7 Article

A numerical study of laminar flames propagating in stratified mixtures

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 461-471

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.10.020

关键词

Stratified-charge combustion; Stratified hydrogen/air mixture; Stratified methane/air mixture; Compositional stratification; Flame speed

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575 [37]]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulations are carried out to study flame propagation in laminar stratified fuel-air mixtures. Studies are carried out in hydrogen-air and methane-air mixtures. A 30-species 184-step skeletal mechanism is employed for methane oxidation and a 9-species 21-step methanism for hydrogen oxidation. The study seeks to provide an improved understanding of possible differences in the local flame speed at an equivalence ratio in the compositionally stratified mixture from the speed in a homogeneous mixture at the same equivalence ratio. Flame speed and temperature profiles are evaluated and compared with corresponding values for homogeneous mixtures. As shown in prior experimental work, the numerical results suggest that when the flame propagates from a richer mixture to a leaner mixture, the flame speed is faster than the corresponding speed of the homogeneous mixture. The flame zone thickness is observed to be thinner in the stratified mixture resulting in sharper gradients. As a result, the rate of diffusion of heat and species increases resulting in increased flame speed. The effects become more pronounced in leaner mixtures. The stratification gradient influences the results with shallower gradients showing less difference in flame speeds between stratified and homogeneous mixtures. The comparative effect of thermal diffusion and species diffusion on the differences in flame speed is studied. It is shown that the species diffusion effect is more important. (C) 2015 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据