4.7 Article

Hierarchical Optimal Allocation of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Multiple Services in Distribution Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 1911-1921

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2019.2946371

关键词

Resource management; Batteries; Mathematical model; Voltage control; Indexes; Planning; Hierarchical Optimal Allocation; Distribution Systems; Battery Energy Storage System; Energy Management; Voltage Regulation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of China Southern Power Grid [ZBKJXM20170049]
  2. Training Program of the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91746118]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801021]
  4. Hong Kong RGC Theme-based Research Scheme [T23-701/14-N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the optimal allocation of battery energy storage systems (BESS) in radial distribution systems for bus voltage regulation and energy cost reduction. A hierarchical planning model is proposed to obtain the optimal configuration (number, locations, and sizes) of BESS. The three interacting levels in the proposed model are: (1) determination of the optimal BESS number; (2) use of a heuristic strategy based on voltage sensitivity analysis to select the most effective locations for a given BESS number in the network; and (3) sizing the BESS capacity to realize optimal operation objectives. The final BESS configuration is selected based on minimization of total life cycle cost, which takes into account the investment cost, residual value of BESS, and system operation cost. The voltage regulation objectives are modeled as constraints. The proposed method reduces computational burden significantly and provides a comprehensive sensitivity analysis and locate the most effective buses to mitigate voltage violation. The effectiveness of this optimal allocation method was demonstrated for a modified IEEE 15-bus and IEEE 69-bus distribution network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据