4.7 Article

Functional Profile of Antigen Specific CD4+T Cells in the Immune Response to Phospholipase A1 Allergen fromPolybia paulistaVenom

期刊

TOXINS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12060379

关键词

Hymenoptera venom allergy; Polybia paulista; CD4(+)T cells

资金

  1. Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)-Brazil [455422/2014-1]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2019/00729-7, 2014/13936-7]
  3. CAPES-DS (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  4. Postgraduate Program in Internal Medicine at the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
  5. FAPESP [2017/22405-3, 2018/24834-1]
  6. Campinas-SP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insect venom can cause systemic allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Improvements in diagnosis and venom immunotherapy (VIT) are based on a better understanding of an immunological response triggered by venom allergens. Previously, we demonstrated that the recombinant phospholipase A1 (rPoly p 1) fromPolybia paulistawasp venom induces specific IgE and IgG antibodies in sensitized mice, which recognized the native allergen. Here, we addressed the T cell immune response of rPoly p 1-sensitized BALB/c mice. Cultures of splenocytes were stimulated withPolybia paulistavenom extract and the proliferation of CD8(+)and CD4(+)T cells and the frequency of T regulatory cells (Tregs) populations were assessed by flow cytometry. Cytokines were quantified in cell culture supernatants in ELISA assays. The in vitro stimulation of T cells from sensitized mice induces a significant proliferation of CD4(+)T cells, but not of CD8(+)T cells. The cytokine pattern showed a high concentration of IFN-gamma and IL-6, and no significant differences to IL-4, IL-1 beta and TGF-beta 1 production. In addition, the rPoly p 1 group showed a pronounced expansion of CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+)and CD4(+)CD25(-)FoxP3(+)Tregs. rPoly p 1 sensitization induces a Th1/Treg profile in CD4(+)T cell subset, suggesting its potential use in wasp venom immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据