4.5 Article

Experimental pain and fatigue induced by excessive chewing

期刊

BMC ORAL HEALTH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01161-z

关键词

Pain model; Fatigue; Chewing gum; Sex differences; Temporomandibular disorders

资金

  1. Stockholm County Council
  2. Karolinska Institutet (SOF
  3. Styrgruppen for Odontologisk Forskning)
  4. Karolinska Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe study was aiming to optimize excessive gum chewing as an experimental model to induce jaw muscle pain and fatigue similar to those in painful TMDs with durations that would allow immediate investigations of jaw-motor function. Further, if any sex differences would be detected in the expression of pain.MethodsThis randomized, double blinded study included 31 healthy participants of both sexes. A standardized chewing protocol of either 40- or 60-min of chewing was used with a wash-out period of 1 week. Subjective fatigue, pain characteristics and functional measures were assessed. For statistical analyses, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test and Friedman's ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test were used.ResultsHigh subjective fatigue scores that lasted up to 20min after the end of the trial were significantly induced both in the 40- and 60-min chewing trials (P< 0.001*). Significant but mild pain was induced only in the 60-min trial (P=0.004*) and only in men (P=0.04*). Also, the induced pain area was significantly bigger in the 60-min trial (P=0.009*). However, this increase in pain and pain area did not last to the first 10-min follow-up. There were no significant differences neither between the 40- and 60-min chewing trials, except regarding the pain area (P=0.008*), nor between the sexes.ConclusionTaken together, excessive chewing in its current form does not seem to be a proper pain experimental model. The model needs further adjustments in order to mimic TMD-pain especially in women and to prolong the pain duration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据