4.5 Review

Ice-Ocean Exchange Processes in the Jovian and Saturnian Satellites

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 216, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-020-00706-6

关键词

Ice-ocean exchange; Europa; Ganymede; Callisto; Enceladus; Titan

资金

  1. NASA [NNX14AR28G]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [19-10809S]
  3. Charles University [UNCE/SCI/023]
  4. NASA through the Cassini Project
  5. Italian Space Agency [2018-25-HH.0]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [724908-Habitat OASIS]
  7. Space Research User Support program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [ALW-GO/16-19]
  8. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-1017]
  9. Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  10. Caltech
  11. Icy Worlds and Titan nodes of NASA's Astrobiology Institute [13-13NAI7_2-0024, 17-NAI8-2-017]
  12. European Space Agency (ESA)
  13. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing number of satellites in the outer solar system likely have global oceans beneath their outer icy shells. While the presence of liquid water makes these ocean worlds compelling astrobiological targets, the exchange of heat and materials between the deep interior and the surface also plays a critical role in promoting habitable environments. In this article, we combine geophysical, geochemical, and geological observations of the Jovian satellites Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto as well as the Saturnian satellites Enceladus and Titan to summarize our current state of understanding of their interiors and surface exchange processes. Potential mechanisms for driving exchange processes upward from the ocean floor and downward from the satellite surface are then reviewed, which are primarily based on numerical models of ice shell and ocean dynamics and complemented by terrestrial analog studies. Future missions to explore these exo-oceans will further revolutionize our understanding of ice-ocean exchange processes and their implications for the habitability of these worlds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据