4.4 Article

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke patients: initial clinical experience

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAI08B10]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171308, 81401389]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) to measure diffusion and perfusion parameter variations in stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight stroke patients were enrolled in the study. IVIM imaging was performed using 15 b-values from 0 to 1000 s/mm(2). Arterial spin labelling (ASL) magnetic resonance perfusion was also undertaken. Relations between the IVIM parameters (including apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], diffusion coefficient D-slow [D], pseudo-diffusion coefficient D-fast [D*], fractional perfusion- related volume [f]) and fD* (the multiplication of the first two parameters) and the ASL-derived parameter, cerebral blood flow (CBF), were analysed using paired t-tests. Comparisons of all the parameters between lesions and contralateral normal regions, as well as between acute and subacute groups were analysed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between f and CBF as well as fD* and CBF (r=0.472 and 0.653). Quantitative analysis showed a significant decrease in ADC, D, D*, f, fD*, and CBF of the lesions compared with the contralateral side, in which the decrease of fD* (68.6%) was highest. The values of ADC, f, and fD* increased in the subacute period group compared with the acute period group. CONCLUSIONS: IVIM analysis allowed separation of perfusion contribution from true diffusion and thus provided an evaluation of the perfusion and diffusion variations during stroke, which might further elucidate the mechanisms of ischaemic stroke. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据