4.7 Article

Hydrogen storage performances, kinetics and microstructure of Ti1.02Cr1.0Fe0.7-xMn0.3Alx alloy by Al substituting for Fe

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 1140-1154

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.035

关键词

Intermetallic; Hydrogen storage; Ti-Cr based alloy; Heat treatment; Hydrogen refueling station

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology [Z17110000091702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51431001, 51771002, U1607126, 21621061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For achieving good economic and environmental benefit, capacity of hydrogen storage alloys plays an important role in high-pressure-metal-hydride system of refueling station. Hydrogen storage characteristics of Ti1.02Cr1.0Fe0.7-xMn0.3Alx (0 <= x <= 0.1) alloys with main C14 structure were analyzed by Pressure-Composition-Temperature, XRD, HRTEM, SEM, EDS, ICP and XPS measurements, which were prepared by plasma arc melting and subsequent heat treatment. When Al content is lower than 0.05, it can improve the hydrogen reversible storage capacity from 1.58 to 1.65 wt% at 233 K. The pulverization resistances are enhanced by addition of Al (Al content: 0.05, 0.1), and the ductile fractures appear on the particle surfaces. Based on kinetic analysis, the dehydrogenation rates are fast with low activation energies between 7.4 and 9.9 ki/mol. The mechanism for Al effecting the capacity is that, the big size effect dominates the capacity increase as Al content less than 0.05. Otherwise, higher Al2O3 content covering on the particles surface deteriorate hydrogen storage capacity as Al content exceeding 0.05. Among them, Ti1.02Cr1.0Fe0.68Mn0.3Al0.02 alloy has the best comprehensive properties for high-pressure metal hydride system in hydrogen refueling station. How to utilize the alloy to assemble the compressor and measure the toxicity resistance to impurity gas in H-2 may be the future work. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据