4.5 Article

A diversity of peri-implant mucosal thickness by site

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 171-176

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12778

关键词

peri-implant mucosal thickness; peri-implantitis

资金

  1. Global Center of Excellence Program for Frontier Research on Molecular Destruction and Reconstruction of Tooth and Bone, Tokyo Medical and Dental University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to examine peri-implant mucosal thickness at different sites of peri-implant crevice around 70 implants placed in 35 patients. Material and methodsThe peri-implant mucosal thickness was defined as distance of the peri-implant mucosal margin and the coronal edge of bone/implant contact and measured using the cast models and dental radiography. ResultsThe overall mean peri-implant mucosal thickness was 3.6 +/- 1.4mm, wherein maxillary anterior implants, maxillary posterior implants and mandibular posterior implants had significantly different dimensions of median thickness of 4.25, 3.75 and 3.0mm, respectively. Furthermore, the mesial and distal sites of those positioned implants measured unevenness in the thickness especially in the maxillary posterior region with statistical significance. ConclusionThe proposed methodology to evaluate peri-implant mucosal thickness measured with a big variation from overall 3.6mm with a big variation from 1.6 to 7.0mm in healthy volunteers. And significant difference was found in the depth among the three regions and, statistically, dispersion of individual peri-implant mucosal thickness resulted in lack of consistency. Although dental implants have been well developed, predictable and prevailing prosthetics, onset of peri-implantitis might be inevitable in some cases. Therefore, establishment of a standardized dimensional diagnosis of peri-implant tissues followed by pathologic ascertainment could be taken into account for the prevention or curing of peri-implantitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据