4.7 Article

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of silk fibroin-hardystonite-gentamicin nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering applications

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106698

关键词

Drug delivery; In vivo; Subcutaneous implant; Nanofiber; Electrospinning; Silk fibroin

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Researches
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. 4 M Biotech Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing advanced biomaterials with regenerative and drug delivering functionalities remains a challenge in the field of tissue engineering. In this paper we present the design, development, and a use case of an electmspun nano-biocomposite scaffold composed of silk fibroin (SF), hardystonite (HT), and gentamicin (GEN). The fabricated SF nanofiber scaffolds provide mechanical support while HT acts as a bioactive and drug carrier, on which GEN is loaded as an antibacterial agent. Antibacterial zone of inhibition (ZOI) results indicate that the inclusion of 3-6 wt% GEN significantly improves the antibacterial performance of the scaffolds against Gramnegative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria, with an initial burst release of 10-20% and 72-85% total release over 7 days. The release rate of stimulatory silicon ions from SF -HT scaffolds reached 94.53 +/- 5 ppm after 7 days. Cell studies using osteoblasts show that the addition of HT significantly improved the cytocompatibility of the scaffolds. Angiogenesis, in vivo biocompatibility, tissue vascularization, and translatability of the scaffolds were studied via subcutaneous implantation in a rodent model over 4-weeks. When implanted subcutaneously, the GEN-loaded scaffold promoted angiogenesis and collagen formation, which suggests that the scaffold may be highly beneficial for further bone tissue engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据