4.4 Article

Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 98, 期 10, 页码 699-705

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000507333

关键词

Carcinosarcoma; Chemotherapy; Second-line chemotherapy; Treatment-free interval

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction:Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.Objective:To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.Methods:We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.Results:Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p= 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.Conclusion:The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据