4.3 Article

Tunneling of massless and massive particles from a quantum deformed Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 959, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115136

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study radiation of a quantum deformed Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a quintessence field, through a tunneling process. When the background spacetime of a black hole is covered by a scalar field, such as a quintessence field, metric of the black hole changes for a particular range of the mass. Then, the geometry of the Schwarzschild black hole with one black hole horizon converts to geometry with two horizons: a black hole horizon and a cosmological horizon. In the presence of the quintessence as a background field, we study the tunneling process for massless and massive particles and we obtain the temperature of the black hole. We calculate and compare particles' tunneling rate from both of the black hole horizon and the cosmological horizon. The obtained temperature is regular, radiation modes encompass correlations and there is the Planck scale remnant with the quintessence contents. As an important result, thermodynamics of the Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by the quintessence field has a significant difference in the range -2/3 < w(q )< -1/3 relative to the ordinary case. Also, the behavior of temperatures in our case becomes similar to the Schwarzschild de-Sitter black hole temperatures. Furthermore, we show that quantum correction of the black hole in an embrace of the quintessence field changes the location of horizons but the quintessence field is more effective in this change. Eventually, while the quantum correction prevents to reach the singularity at r = 0 in the final stage of the evaporation of the quantum deformed Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence, there is a Planck scale remnant with quintessence content. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据