4.1 Article

High contribution of methane in greenhouse gas emissions from a eutrophic lake: a mass balance synthesis

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2020.1798476

关键词

Lake; eutrophic; greenhouse gas; CO2; CH4; thermal stratification

资金

  1. NZ-ASEAN Scholarship - Ministry of Business, Innovation Employment [UOWX0505]
  2. Bay of Plenty Chair in Lake Restoration at the University of Waikato

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified the processes affecting CO2 and CH4 concentrations in Lake Okaro, New Zealand, and found that the lake acted as a sink for atmospheric CO2 and a source for CH4, resulting in a net GHG emission. Although conservative and only applying to diffusive fluxes, the study suggests that eutrophic lakes with high primary production rates may be net sources of GHGs.
Lakes are 'hotspots' for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). Understanding the processes regulating GHG emissions from lakes, and their temporal variability, is essential for more accurately quantifying the role of lakes in global GHG cycles. In this study, we identified the processes that affect CO(2)and CH(4)concentrations in a small (0.3 km(2)) eutrophic monomictic lake (Okaro, New Zealand). A mass balance model was used to calculate changes in CO(2)and CH(4)storage in the lake as a result of internal cycling and atmospheric fluxes. To support model computations, CO(2)and CH(4)concentrations profiles were measured monthly over a one-year period, in addition to temperature, dissolved oxygen and chlorophylla. Annually, Lake Okaro acted as a sink of CO(2)from the atmosphere (425.4 mmol CO(2)m(-2)y(-1)) and a source of CH4(553.4 mmol CH(4)m(-2)y(-1)) equating to a net GHG emission (diffusive fluxes of CO(2)and CH(4)combined) of 0.22 kg CO2-eq m(-2)y(-1). Although it may be viewed as conservative and applies only to diffusive fluxes, our study indicates that eutrophic lakes with high rates of primary production may act as a net source of GHGs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据