4.7 Article

Connexin 43: A novel ginsenoside Rg1-sensitive target in a rat model of depression

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108041

关键词

Depression; Ginsenoside Rg1; Astrocyte; Gap junction; Connexin 43

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573636, 81773924, 81560663]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7182114]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018RC350010]
  4. National Megaproject for Innovative Drugs [2018ZX09711001-002-007, 2018ZX09711001-003-005, 2018ZX09711001-009-013]
  5. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2016-I2M-1-004]
  6. Hunan Engineering Technology Center of Standardization and Function of Chinese Herbal Decoction Pieces [2016TP2008, BG201701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous studies have shown that ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1) exerts antidepressant-like effects in animal models of depression, accompanied by an improvement of astrocytic gap junction functions. However, whether connexin 43 (Cx43), the major connexin forming gap junctions between astrocytes, is the key regulator of Rg1-induced antidepressant-like effects is still unknown. In this study, we examine in vitro and in vivo the involvement of Cx43 in the antidepressant effects of Rg1. Corticosterone was used to establish an in vitro rat model of depression. Treatment with Rg1 1 h prior to corticosterone significantly improved the cell viability of astrocytes, which was significantly inhibited by carbenoxolone, a widely used gap junction inhibitor. Moreover, Rg1 treatment significantly ameliorated antidepressant-sensitive behaviours induced by infusion of carbenoxolone or Gap26, a selective inhibitor of Cx43, into the prefrontal cortex of the animals. Rg1 treatment increased the expression of Cx43 compared with Gap26 group. According to these results, the antidepressant-like effects of Rg1 were mainly mediated by Cx43-formed gap junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据